At what point did a blog, and one so famous for being a pain in the backside of conservatives, suddenly stop providing any opinion about a news posting on a “legitimate” newspaper website.
Perhaps I missed the actual additional discussion that blogs are supposed to render about some other news providers fact checking and work.
This is the link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/02/supreme-court-decisions-i_n_171160.html
and the blog entry associated with it on Huffington Post is simply:
“The Supreme Court is entering the YouTube era. The first citation in a
petition filed with the court last month, for instance, was not to an affidavit
or legal precedent but rather to a video link.”And it then goes to: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/us/03bar.html?_r=1
Related posts:
- Monetizing, Sharing, and ownership of creative juices…
- I've had a bad feeling about the word Arbitrage since Enron.
- MailFire, MailGuard, and MailAmi.com, I miss my spam firewall.
- Murdoch is the Anti-Google; Wants to remove "his" content.
- I'm assuming Murdoch is calling Bloggers specifically, plagiarists and kleptomaniacs.
You must log in to post a comment.