<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Hatch &#187; My Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jameshatch.com/category/my-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jameshatch.com</link>
	<description>Researching the merging of Business, Technology &#38; Ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ed Bott is just plain wrong.</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/24/ed-bott-is-just-plain-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/24/ed-bott-is-just-plain-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/apples-mind-bogglingly-greedy-and-evil-license-agreement/4360">Ed Bott</a> was part of the This Week in Tech panel hosted by Leo Laporte. He cut into another panelists comment about how there are other EULA&#8217;s out there that limit the use of software to particular sectors. Ed Bott said that it wasn&#8217;t true, ONLY Apple would have the sheer audacity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/apples-mind-bogglingly-greedy-and-evil-license-agreement/4360">Ed Bott</a> was part of the This Week in Tech panel hosted by Leo Laporte. He cut into another panelists comment about how there are other EULA&#8217;s out there that limit the use of software to  particular sectors. Ed Bott said that it wasn&#8217;t true, ONLY Apple would have the sheer audacity to propose such a thing. Well, he&#8217;s just wrong.</p>
<p>Prior to CS4, Adobe&#8217;s Student/Educational edition prevented users from producing commercial works. Microsoft Office Home and Student CURRENTLY prevents users from producing commercial works [page 21 of 24 in the English EULA]. That is just two quick looks at EULA&#8217;s that Ed Bott suggests he reads so that you don&#8217;t have to [his quote on his post about the Apple EULA, not my interpretation].</p>
<p>Ed is just plain wrong. For software, I hardly read the EULA. Why? Because I have no negotiating power to edit it, submit it for acceptance and have a meeting of the minds. A VERY important aspect of creating a contract between two parties. Without it, the contract is void. So, in essence, you either accept the EULA and use the software, or don&#8217;t and delete it.</p>
<p>Ed said he has read it multiple times, as per his many edits to his blog post [at least he discloses that]. Currently, he has read it 4 times. But misses the point that Adobe charges $450 for the current plain vanilla version of Photoshop for students and educators, but it allows both to create commercial works. The Microsoft Student edition still requires no commercial compensation for works created by the student edition and that costs around $100 depending on where you go to get it. </p>
<p>Again, only two applications, one an application that allows, but costs several hundred, one that does not and costs around a hundred. Apple iBooks Author is free and is a one stop shop for publishing. The only limit is that it has to go through Apple for sales. One of the largest marketing and distribution machines on the planet. It also costs a certain percentage. Less than publishers, more than free.</p>
<p>Apparently, Mr. Bott wants the software to be free, the publishing, distribution and marketing to be free, the work to be produced on that free software for use anywhere on top of that and for icing on the cake, he wants it to be sold for free too because 30% is way too much for doing everything except writing the work.</p>
<p>He also takes exception to the definition of &#8220;work&#8221; or &#8220;Work&#8221; which is just odd. Even calling it shoddy lawyering.</p>
<p>It all smacks of bias and link bait marketing around a new product and service that people have wanted for several years. A quick and easy way to get published without having to submit your work (Work) to a hundred publishers, only to get rejected again and again. Ultimately landing on some good spirit who gives a low ball offer, we&#8217;ll call it the inverse relationship to the Apple offering, so 70% goes to the publisher and 30% goes to the author. Then you have to wait for checks, go to book stores for signings [not for fun, but because you have to get out there and show your face], and hope that the publisher pulls their own weight.</p>
<p>Apple promotes the hell out of its foundation product(s), the iPad, iPhone and iPod get TV time. How many publishers do the same?</p>
<p>I think Ed Bott is just plain wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/24/ed-bott-is-just-plain-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a brand new year, it&#8217;s time to start bringing out the products&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/02/brand-year-time-start-bringing-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/02/brand-year-time-start-bringing-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m a one person shop at HATCHideas, which used to be a service name used at my first company named SHOREtech Systems, LLC; I&#8217;ve been working on re-launching under the HATCHideas name since SHOREtech closed at the end of 2005.</p> <p>Well, it&#8217;s 2012 now and its time to get back in the saddle. So, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I&#8217;m a one person shop at HATCHideas, which used to be a service name used at my first company named SHOREtech Systems, LLC; I&#8217;ve been working on re-launching under the HATCHideas name since SHOREtech closed at the end of 2005.</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s 2012 now and its time to get back in the saddle. So, I&#8217;m launching concepts via Quirky. Quirky is a crowd-sourced development company. Simply put, if the idea you propose is well positioned and people vote it up, Quirky may take it under their wing and develop it to fruition. Pretty cool.</p>
<p>What do I get out of it? A portion of the profits and a public feather in my cap that I created another product. I like that that too.</p>
<p>So, visit <a title="Quirky &amp; My Bluetooth Enabled Capactive Pen with Gyroscope and Inductive Charging System" href="http://www.quirky.com/ideations/150361">Quirky</a> to vote on my idea for a Bluetooth Enabled Capacitive Pen with Pressure Sensitivity, Gyroscope to detect the angle of the pen, programmable buttons, eraser end cap and inductive charging system. Follow this link for that, and you can swing by my company site at <a href="http://www.hatchideas.com/blog/2012/01/02/bluetooth-enabled-capacitive-pen-pressure-sensitivity-gyroscope-angle-inductive-charging-quirky/">HATCHideas</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2012/01/02/brand-year-time-start-bringing-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Louis CK $5 Experiment in Critical Mass</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/12/18/louis-ck-5-experiment-critical-mass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/12/18/louis-ck-5-experiment-critical-mass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll start out with the quote from Fred Wilson [<a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2011/12/some-thoughts-on-the-louis-ck-experiment.html">AVC</a>] who states quite simply what I believe is key to what Louis CK&#8217;s success in his experiment but I take it one step further:</p> <p>&#8220;Some will say that Louis can do this because he is a star. That is true. And I sure hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll start out with the quote from Fred Wilson [<a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2011/12/some-thoughts-on-the-louis-ck-experiment.html">AVC</a>] who states quite simply what I believe is key to what Louis CK&#8217;s success in his experiment but I take it one step further:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Some will say that Louis can do this because he is a star. That is true. And I sure hope other stars will follow his lead and go direct to their fans. They can also go direct to their fans and raise the upfront production costs on Kickstarter. They can use any number of internet services to process the payments (paypal), host the video (vimeo), and get distribution (twitter). This is not that hard.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, Wilson is accurate with this statement. I believe that stardom alone isn&#8217;t going to make a work product successful. Here are some things you&#8217;ll see on the AVC post that were also fundamental to the success. Louis CK appears to be humble about his cost/benefit analysis and his opportunity cost regarding the production of the experiment.</p>
<p>A couple hundred thousand dollars were spent in creating this, the site, etc. Very difficult to justify until something is reached&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Critical Mass : The minimum amount of fissile material needed to maintain a nuclear chain reaction.</p>
<p>There is a video  of what it takes to create a movement. It is a TED talk and is pretty famous for its brevity, humor and profound embodiment of exactly what happens when like minded people form around a single firebrand. Here is a link to the TEDtalk [<a title="How to start a movement." href="http://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement.html">Link</a>]. This critical mass is the key to creating a movement. They are one in the same really. The key is both is the ignition point, the firebrand, the trend setter.</p>
<p>Another instance of the Anti-DRM, Low Cost, &#8220;Experiment&#8221; was Minecraft which became a multimillion dollar success because of dyed in the wool fans who fell in love with the 8-bit experience. Probably because they didn&#8217;t live through it. Besides that, sites rallied the platform. Sites like Reddit.com were abuzz with news about Minecraft and eventually it did something that all companies seemingly do. They became &#8220;real&#8221; and started charging real money for marginal benefit (at least in my opinion, but I hardly am a fanatic about anything). Now it is on the iOS, Android and I believe Xbox platforms. But keep in mind, it had a window of opportunity and was ready for it, the people who loved it were vocal and a movement formed. Who the actual firebrand was that started the trend towards making Mojang a success; I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Another instance is the Coldplay Pay-What-You-Want model. This too is a critical mass flashpoint of success. Just like Louis CK, the success comes from god-knows how many hours of work done by the artists themselves and perceived to be a success because accounting for their time isn&#8217;t really a factor. They did it for the love of the music and the experiment. Others have done the same thing, but I can&#8217;t remember them all right now. Nine Inch Nails is probably the next most notable. But this came from years of working within the system, banging their head against the frustration of such and then after reaching critical mass and having the full ability to make such a risk possible; they do it and suddenly people grab hold of this and think&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>See&#8230; Louis CK [probably the hottest comedian going right now], and Minecraft [a flash mob of online zealotry brought this success], and Coldplay [after years of making standard industry moves] and Nine Inch Nails [ditto]&#8230; did it, which means the whole damn system should pivot and follow suit.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I agree. But only because I think DRM is the bane of law abiding consumers and it makes life more difficult for us while doing nothing to prevent &#8220;them&#8221; [the evil pirates] from doing what they do. I think pirating is stealing, you won&#8217;t find a pirate that says otherwise unless they are simply in denial. The cost of these products is too-damn-high because there are so many steps between creator and consumer. The fact remains though, the people who have made these amazing successes are not the typical content creators. Stepping back, you&#8217;ll see that everything gets pirated by someone unless its my article here on my site.</p>
<p>Because of protectionism versus the pirates, consumers have to sit through copyright notices and advertisements for other things we already saw in the store as we were picking up the Blu-Ray we purchased. Over the last 20 years, consumers have had their hands slowly tied behind their backs.  We can no longer return movies, music or electronics because the stores won&#8217;t allow it for anything other than store credit (at a 15% loss) and we can&#8217;t try them out because of various reasons [I don't want to put public consumption headphones on my head, they don't have the electronic device I want to try out set up in the store, they wont play the movie and let me sit in the theater in BestBuy for 3 hours while I watch Lord of the Rings].</p>
<p>Anyway, these various examples are the exception, not the rule and shouldn&#8217;t be used as the measuring stick. Only those who have reached critical mass and as such have reached stardom will benefit from such displays. Those who do similar within a reasonable amount of time can gain from a halo effect&#8230; after that, poof. The smoke and mirrors disappear and reality again takes over.</p>
<p>In the end, removing all of the intermediate steps between consumer and creator will lead to the talented rising to the top without the help of big time marketing, labels, etc. Talent will have to get better as technology is no longer limited to the wealthy labels and legal machines that feed us content now. We are living in interesting times. I think it&#8217;s time for the talent to be rewarded for their talent. Good luck to the next person who takes a leap and experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/12/18/louis-ck-5-experiment-critical-mass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Much Blogging Going On&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/11/10/blogging-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/11/10/blogging-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been busy with the baby [Max is 10 months old now, time flies] and school [next semester is my last] which will complete step 2 of my three step effort to catch up to where I should have been 20 years ago. I&#8217;ll have an MBA (Strategic Management/Marketing Concentration) and a MSIT (Information Assurance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been busy with the baby [Max is 10 months old now, time flies] and school [next semester is my last] which will complete step 2 of my three step effort to catch up to where I should have been 20 years ago. I&#8217;ll have an MBA (Strategic Management/Marketing Concentration) and a MSIT (Information Assurance Concentration) and then its about raising the baby and working on my web based projects of which I still have many creeping towards the end zone. Ever so slowly.</p>
<p>I tried to start writing for NaNoWriMo [National Novel Writing Month] but Max got a nasty little cold and then he gave it to me. Mom didn&#8217;t get it though, so that&#8217;s good. Max has his own website still at MaxwellHatch.com if you want to stop by and see what he is up to. We almost bought a house. They asked for something that made me pause for a little bit. When I finally got back to them, they sold the lot we wanted.</p>
<p>I almost got a new [used, new cars are great for the warranty but I've never liked paying $30,000+ for something I now only put about 500 miles on each month and gets dinged up by people who don't understand physics] car because the stroller doesn&#8217;t fit in my little car so I can&#8217;t take Max out without taking JP&#8217;s car. First car, the dealer sold before I could tell them to hold it [but no other car in my list moved], then a second car was sold between talking to the guy and me coming in [two days], then the third car I wanted suddenly got sold two days after I told the dealer to bring the car up to the dealership for me to look at and after I told him I had the check ready.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to Max who is demanding my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/11/10/blogging-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damnit! I don&#8217;t want Facebook Connecting to EVERYTHING!</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/25/damnit-facebook-connecting-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/25/damnit-facebook-connecting-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Look, I&#8217;m a cheerleader for technology, and even some level of social networking. But damnit, I don&#8217;t want Facebook connecting to everything I&#8217;m doing. I don&#8217;t want my actions online, posted to a board somewhere else. I want balkanization, compartmentalization, privacy.</p> <p>Zuckerbergs idea that we&#8217;re happier when the world knows when I go to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I&#8217;m a cheerleader for technology, and even some level of social networking. But damnit, I don&#8217;t want Facebook connecting to everything I&#8217;m doing. I don&#8217;t want my actions online, posted to a board somewhere else. I want balkanization, compartmentalization, privacy.</p>
<p>Zuckerbergs idea that we&#8217;re happier when the world knows when I go to the bathroom or BBQ a burger is bunk. Maybe I&#8217;m just too old. But, now I can&#8217;t subscribe to Spotify [for the moment], nor Turntable.fm [an idea I had 15 years ago but because I don't have pull, it never came to be].</p>
<p>Both of those sites/services require a Facebook login. Ridiculous. If you are going to make a service, let it garner customers from any source and don&#8217;t require only one because than you aren&#8217;t an independent company. You are at the whim of the one providing your customers. If they are paying you for each customer, awesome. Disclose that price and see if customers will pay it so they don&#8217;t have to be yet another profit source for Facebook.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t have anything against a service wanting to get as many customers as possible. I disagree with the Zuckerberg model that everyone and every damn little action should be public and everyone interconnected and stored in a single database. It is disgusting.</p>
<p>Ugh. So, in this instance, what I usually would do [protest with my wallet], I can&#8217;t do because they don&#8217;t even want someone who isn&#8217;t following the Facebook party line.</p>
<p>Whatever&#8230; I guess I&#8217;ll listen to Pandora and Rdio.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/25/damnit-facebook-connecting-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Birthday and Why I don&#8217;t Celebrate &#8220;a day.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/19/birthday-celebrate-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/19/birthday-celebrate-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, September contains the day that represents my birth day. This September I turned 40. I stopped caring about my birthday sometime in my late teens. I *DON&#8217;T* (WOW, what a missing word does to the meaning of a message.) poo poo other peoples birthdays, although I&#8217;m not one to go bananas over one, I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, September contains the day that represents my birth day. This September I turned 40. I stopped caring about my birthday sometime in my late teens. I *DON&#8217;T* (WOW, what a missing word does to the meaning of a message.) poo poo other peoples birthdays, although I&#8217;m not one to go bananas over one, I&#8217;ll show up and bring a gift and drink a beer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve felt this way because I think every day should be celebrated as best you can. Again, I don&#8217;t go bananas and tell people to smile when they aren&#8217;t because today is such a great and beautiful day. But I just think a person shouldn&#8217;t get flowers only a certain day. They shouldn&#8217;t be reminded of their birth and what a joy it is that they are to have around.. but only on that day. The same goes for Mother&#8217;s Day, Father&#8217;s Day, Christmas, etc. I probably feel this way because I think the world has commercialized the meanings into profit centers instead of their true core moral.</p>
<p>I randomly buy my wife gifts, and we go out for her Birthday. My new son will be able to enjoy birthdays until he decides he doesn&#8217;t care about them because I grew up that way. I was pondering this issue of birthdays and celebrations for the sake of the day instead of the meaning behind it because friends, family and events have been coming and going while I have been just living my life.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Then I found someone else who feels the same way. As a lurking Redditor, the submission made me think about it some more:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/kjljv/how_many_of_you_redditors_feel_no_need_to/" target="_blank">How many of you Redditors feel no need to celebrate your birthday?</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Apparently I&#8217;m not alone. I say that a lot as well, but back 25-20 year ago, I started writing a book called just that&#8230;&#8221;You are not alone.&#8221; while I was struggling with life decisions. I had actually placed an ad in a magazine to get people to write stories about what they are going through. The web wasn&#8217;t big back then. AOL was king. Bulletin Board Systems existed in the basement of a house somewhere so you had to dial up a computer using your 56k modem. Har har. I&#8217;m old. 40 Years Old.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I sometimes forget how old I am. I am reminded by people who care more about my birthday than I do. I got a few cards from family and friends who said &#8220;Happy 40th&#8221; and then I looked at the thread on Reddit and as a technophile the one that stuck out was from &#8220;PumpValve&#8221;:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;I HATE my birthday. I wish I could unsubscribe from them (without dying).&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I don&#8217;t hate my birthday. But I don&#8217;t need reminding that I&#8217;m getting older. It reminds me of things that I really don&#8217;t care to be reminded of. I&#8217;m one of those people who mull things over and try to solve the problem. Some problems can&#8217;t be fixed. Just written off. I&#8217;m not trying to be a downer, really. I just don&#8217;t want gifts, reminders, or annual announcements that someone out there cares enough to write me a card. I&#8217;m pretty casual about things. I don&#8217;t bother people with emails or phone calls, just to call. It isn&#8217;t that I don&#8217;t care about them, but why bother someone who is probably doing what I&#8217;m doing right now; living life.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you want to talk, call me, write me, stop by. I&#8217;m cool with that. We can go have a beer, or play a game, or whatever [as long as I can bring Max, I do take care of him all day.]. But you can keep the cards, the gifts [send money to your favorite charity in your own name] and the reminders; make those reminders more about letting me know YOUR birthday is coming up if you care that much about birthdays. I&#8217;ll get you something and help you celebrate.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In the meantime&#8230; I&#8217;m unsubscribing from my birthday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/09/19/birthday-celebrate-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert SuperPAC from sublime to ridiculous.</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/30/colbert-superpac-from-sublime-to-ridiculous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/30/colbert-superpac-from-sublime-to-ridiculous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Shame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not much of a political person. A long story there, but that isn&#8217;t what this post is about. I just wanted to make it a point in stating that I&#8217;ll never be in office because when you take money from people so you can run for office, they expect something in return. I refuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not much of a political person. A long story there, but that isn&#8217;t what this post is about. I just wanted to make it a point in stating that I&#8217;ll never be in office because when you take money from people so you can run for office, they expect something in return. I refuse to be purchased. That being said, the FEC today approved the Colbert SuperPAC, which if you don&#8217;t know it.. a superPAC [Political Action Committee] allows an organization to accept donations well beyond individual contribution amounts. Corporations can donate to their hearts content and influence politicians in a way that makes my ethics meter get buried on the &#8220;Impropriety&#8221; scale. The scale has four sectors, I&#8217;m a centrist balancing the cost/benefit analysis without the swing most scales have. [try it, put something heavy on a scale... then take it off and watch it swing to the other side.]</p>
<p>Anyway, the FEC voted 5 to 1 but put a limit on the use of those funds. He can only use advertisements created by the show [that have political tones] within the network. I&#8217;ll make a prediction right now. This will start a very powerful discussion on first amendment rights. I can&#8217;t say I know of any SuperPAC that is limited in such a way which means there is essentially special treatment and limitations put on the Colbert SuperPAC.</p>
<p>FOX News and MSNBC skirt these political issues by not selling their particular brand of partisanship outside of their network, both of which is expansive. Comedy Central doesn&#8217;t have such a grand network and typically draws attention to the absurdity of politics.</p>
<p>Well, as absurd as this is to say, if I run for office, you can rest assured that I will not cheat on my wife, take money for favors, benefit from my position [other than my pay], and I will not tweet pictures of my crotch. Will you vote for me?</p>
<p>Here is some <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/hotline/fec-rules-narrowly-on-colbert-request-20110630">professional journalism</a> regarding the matter, I put this here simply because I&#8217;m neither professional on this blog, nor a journalist. Just a guy with an opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/30/colbert-superpac-from-sublime-to-ridiculous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groupon.com, Facebook.com, the Dot-Com Bubble and MobShop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/05/groupon-com-facebook-com-the-dot-com-bubble-and-mobshop-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/05/groupon-com-facebook-com-the-dot-com-bubble-and-mobshop-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ve been around for awhile. I remember places and used services like AOL, CompuServe, @Home and more. Many, many, many more. I was around for the Dot-Com Bubble and watched as millions were given to places like DEN (Digital Entertainment Network) which imploded in a spending-gasm and then got caught for tertiary illegal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ve been around for awhile. I remember places and used services like AOL, CompuServe, @Home and more. Many, many, many more. I was around for the Dot-Com Bubble and watched as millions were given to places like DEN (Digital Entertainment Network) which imploded in a spending-gasm and then got caught for tertiary illegal activity. Like the bygone age of dotcoms, this bubble that people are talking about is much more consolidated and the values have grown over the 10+ years by an equal amount. About 10 times the amount of money is being raised by IPO bound companies as would have been given in the original dot-com bubble. This brings me to the other elements from the title, but not the main point. I&#8217;m burying the lede, in journalism parlance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For instance, FACEBOOK is valued in the billions but is no different than AOL would have been if AOL would have grown into an Internet company instead of a service that was self-contained. I&#8217;ve said this in the past, but wanted to remind people that the difference between AOL and FACEBOOK fall onto the backbone of the Internet. Without the open transfer of information, Facebook would be doomed to the same fate as AOL. AOL had everything that Facebook has, but was a walled garden (arguably a garden). Nonetheless, Facebook.com exists as an element of the Internet and it is quickly oozing into websites with &#8220;Like&#8221; buttons, just as much as Google is now hoping that they ooze into websites with &#8220;+1&#8243; buttons (without the walled garden of AOL or Facebook).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So, we have this inflated value, and venture capitalists love being on the first wave leading up to an IPO because their valuation is capitalized once they can exit after an IPO [or whatever timeframe they designated]. But, an IPO bound company can pay the initial investors with the IPO garnered money. The IPO days of the last Dotcom era led to a reanalysis of just what was being provided. Many companies simply had nothing. They offered nothing. They filled no need.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">MobShop.com was a company that was part of this original Dotcom era. It was a group shopping site that consisted of a bunch of people purchasing an item and as the item was purchased, the price dropped. It was a fun site to buy stuff from. But the &#8220;reserve price&#8221; of this price drop was not known except for a small snippet that showed that with more buyers the price would drop &#8220;x&#8221; dollars. With Groupon.com, the Reserve Price is known, but in the form of &#8220;X&#8221; number of sales are required for the offer to be fulfilled. Sort of like KickStarter.com.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">An article by LAURIE J. FLYNN in the New York Times from the era contains the quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8221;Consumers just never warmed to the aggregated buy concept,&#8221; said  Robert Parker, an analyst at AMR Research in Boston. &#8221;What was missing  was a better sense of affiliation, like group buying for Harley riders  or something like that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now social networks are creating that affiliation that Parker speaks of, but Groupon.com doesn&#8217;t do that. The IPO for Groupon.com was cancelled, but, like my theory, the value was around $100 million. The IPO for Groupon.com is estimated currently at $750 Million. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it would have landed around $1 Billion if reviews of the books would have been slightly more beneficial to the IPO. But the general public got to review the books through the IPO filing and noticed that Groupon.com was riding the same effect that MobShop.com was riding&#8230; irrational exuberance. People who are investors, and capable of spending money on an IPO investment and then get out, will hype the offering. Marc Andreessen was an investor in MobShop as well. Of course Andreessen is saying there is no bubble. Why would he? He wouldn&#8217;t be investing in tech companies if he believed it to be a bubble.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Couple this with the massive amount of money circulating in the economy, what I think is a double-dip, and irrational exuberance and you&#8217;ve got another bubble. But one that won&#8217;t impact anything short of resetting the clock for another 10 years of Internet growth for smaller businesses, hopes and efforts from entrepreneurs. These entrepreneurs will now think that billions are the new hundred-millions and those of us without either will wonder how the hell we&#8217;ll get to that level.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Too Long; Didn&#8217;t Read?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Facebook = AOL; Both Overpriced. Groupon.com = MobShop.com (circa 2001); Both Provided Minimal Benefit. Massive Amount of Currency Circulating in Big Business = Huge Valuations; People lost the concept of a dollars value. Stock Market + Irrational Exuberance = Bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/06/05/groupon-com-facebook-com-the-dot-com-bubble-and-mobshop-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vegetarian + Attorney + Surprise Bacon = Very Angry Vegetarian Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/26/vegetarian-attorney-surprise-bacon-very-angry-vegetarian-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/26/vegetarian-attorney-surprise-bacon-very-angry-vegetarian-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">So, I&#8217;m married to a vegetarian who happens to be an attorney.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">If you are reading this, you probably know this fact. But what you may not know is that when a vegetarian ingests meat, their stomach gets very upset. What is worst though, is that it is akin to an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">So, I&#8217;m married to a vegetarian who happens to be an attorney.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you are reading this, you probably know this fact. But what you may not know is that when a vegetarian ingests meat, their stomach gets very upset. What is worst though, is that it is akin to an alcoholic taking a chug of a drink only to find out it had alcohol in it. Years of vigilance, gone. Gone are the years of self-imposed prohibition. Gone is the sanctity of their body. They feel violated. It makes them angry. It makes them want to sue, if they can sue. It certainly doesn&#8217;t make them want to go back to the place that contaminated their body.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">That feeling that they&#8217;ve &#8220;kept clean&#8221; for 23 years is gone.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And this is what I explained to the manager today at the <strong>Glory Days in Frederick</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I stressed to the waitress&#8230; that this is for a vegetarian&#8230; as I was ordering.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;There should be no bacon, no meat of any kind.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What we got halfway through my wife&#8217;s lunch was contrary to that. Some surprise bacon made it into her veggieburger wrap, and I tried to convince her that she caught it in time. But when there are pieces sitting on the plate and one on her fork, you have to wonder. So, all day yesterday she was not feeling all that well. Not enough to go to the emergency room and get her stomach pumped, not enough to make her unable to do her job. But, again&#8230; years of philosophical and dietary control wasted.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It is pretty hard for a vegetarian, married to an omnivore [I'll eat a hubcap if you put Tabasco on it], to find good quality meals unless you make them at home. Not always possible, time wise, convenience wise. Certainly not for us because we don&#8217;t have meat-eater food in the house so I usually go out for food during lunch. Still&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We&#8217;ve been going to that Glory Days since it opened. I was one of the first people through the door. We&#8217;ve enjoyed our times there. We were known by the staff, my baby was known as the unofficial mascot of Glory Days Frederick. It was funny how everyone just loved him. But now I feel that I can&#8217;t trust either the reading skills of the cooks, or the ability of the wait-staff to properly write down what is ordered. Seeing my wife physically ill, and psychologically upset&#8230; did the same to me. It got me to the point that I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll go back there, I&#8217;ll certainly relay the story to friends and family if they offer up Glory Days as a destination for food. Trust and Reputation is really all that we have. It is the reason I started <a title="Mobble.com - What the world thinks of you." href="http://www.mobble.com/" target="_blank">Mobble.com</a>, so people could more adequately relate and quantify those characteristics that make up our experiences.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some may think it isn&#8217;t a big deal. &#8220;She wasn&#8217;t the alcoholic in your example.&#8221;  But what if she was? What if she had a food allergy?  Should we write it off and not be upset? How about not blog about it as a means of venting the frustration that accompanies a bad lunch?  We didn&#8217;t just not get what we ordered. They crossed a line either through willful action because she ordered a vegetarian meal, or through incompetence. Either way, after 23 years, my wife just ate bacon. Something she hasn&#8217;t eaten since she was able to make that decision.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Well, I&#8217;m not one of those people. I don&#8217;t just write things off. Particularly when you interact with the public by providing a service. Complaining doesn&#8217;t fix the matter. They took her meal off the check. Left mine to pay. Out of stupidity in not wanting to blame the waitress [we don't know who failed, just that the entire process did]&#8230; I left a tip.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">My wife can&#8217;t get back the 23 years of being a vegetarian. She has to start over. We won&#8217;t be back. They will shrug, others will shrug. Just put yourself in those shoes for a second and see if you shrug your shoulders. Picture yourself doing something for longer than most people hold a career, only to see some careless or malevolent person wipe away your hard work. As I asked the manager&#8230; &#8220;Have you ever done ANYTHING for 23 years?&#8221; To which I get the response &#8220;No sir, I haven&#8217;t.&#8221; And I respond with &#8220;Now understand that your careless action has wiped away 23 years of work, practice and self-discipline.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;Sorry.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Time to start eating in. Which doesn&#8217;t help the local economy because you can only buy from big stores with remote HQ&#8217;s. GD was local. We tipped 20+ percent. We spent way too much money there. That is all gone now too. Us suggesting that we take a group of people there for dinner&#8230; gone.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;Sorry.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/26/vegetarian-attorney-surprise-bacon-very-angry-vegetarian-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Studies, Child, Projects and no time.</title>
		<link>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/20/studies-child-projects-and-no-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/20/studies-child-projects-and-no-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameshatch.com/?p=2200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been blogging much. Basically, I&#8217;m too busy studying, taking care of the new member of the family, and working on Mobble.com. Primarily studies and the baby who is calling me right now. So, not much is happening here on the blog. I&#8217;m still keeping abreast of all of the technology goings-on, but don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been blogging much. Basically, I&#8217;m too busy studying, taking care of the new member of the family, and working on Mobble.com. Primarily studies and the baby who is calling me right now. So, not much is happening here on the blog. I&#8217;m still keeping abreast of all of the technology goings-on, but don&#8217;t have time to blog about it. Things need to be consolidated for me and presented to me in a fast interface. The keyboard, Mouse and Video is simply too slow. But we&#8217;re not in the world of Cyberpunk 2020. Yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve retracted my many projects as much as I can right now and will post periodically on those sites that will remain.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jameshatch.com/2011/04/20/studies-child-projects-and-no-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

